Commentary by Martin Diano
We all receive emails alerting us about a computer virus spreading across the Internet, or a 'can't miss' stock market tip, or scandalous information about a political candidate running for high office, or, most of the time, information about a deal that seems just too good to be true.
Your inclination, of course, is to immediately share the information with your family and friends. You select the names and hit the forward button—off the message goes to help others. You're feeling pretty good about yourself knowing that you're helping family and friends by sharing this nugget of vital information.Good intentions aside, however, more often than not the information you just sent is erroneous and, on more occasions then you might think, is outright and deliberately false.
Here's an example:
Recently, I received from a very level-headed friend an email containing urgent information about, of all things, "baby carrots." The email's subject line pronounced "Baby Carrots: Beware" dealt with a stern warning by an unnamed farmer against eating baby carrots.The following is information from this unidentified farmer, who grows and packages carrots for IGA, METRO, LOBLAWS, and similar food outlets.
The warning, says my friend, appeared on Snopes.com. She assumed the information was accurate and forwarded the email to her friends and family.The email asserts "once the carrots are cut and shaped into cocktail carrots they are dipped in a solution of water and chlorine in order to preserve them (this is the same chlorine used your pool) since they do not have their skin or natural protective covering, they give them a higher dose of chlorine."
The warning went on to say "You will notice that once you keep these carrots in your refrigerator for a few days, a white covering will form on the carrots, this is the chlorine which resurfaces. At what cost do we put our health at risk to have esthetically pleasing vegetables which are practically plastic?"
The email urged me to pass on the information to as many people as possible in the hopes of informing them as to where the carrots came from and how they are processed. "Chlorine is a very well known carcinogen," it warned.
A bit leery of the allegation, I opted not to forward the message.
The very next day a second email arrived from my friend. But this time to recant her assertion about the dangers of baby carrots and offered a genuine apology to the people she had sent the message."Sorry about this," she said ruefully. "My cousin [name intentionally omitted] checked this out on Snoops and it turns out this story is not true. I don’t want to hurt [somebody’s] business with false claims."
The lesson to be learned: Never forward an email about information than can not be verified by a reputable source, preferably one that is nationally recognized.
I still have great respect for my well-intentioned friend. And I know she learned a very valuable lesson.
About Martin DianoMartin is publisher of the Baby Boomer [Knowledge Center]™ and Founder of Boomer Authority™. You can follow him on Twitter @MartinDiano, Friend him on Facebook, and connect with him on LinkedIn.




9 comments:
I second this recommendation!
I can't tell you how many times I've received one of these 'warning' e-mails and researched them, only to find them to be bogus. My advice is NEVER forward an e-mail that asks you to forward it to everyone you know (regardless of who sent it to you) and ALWAYS check the facts of any online rumor you may come across before propagating it.
Keep in mind that many of these rumors are being deliberately spread to cause an emotional response that is designed to flood the internet with unnecessary traffic. These things fall into the category of 'denial of service attacks'. You can do your part by refusing to participate.
Now send this e-mail to everyone you know . . . :-)
You are 100% correct. I receive these types of emails all the time and become frustrated that the sender did not act responsiby and check Snopes before spreading false rumors. Too bad Norton's can't scan our emails for hoaxes!
I agree with Les totally and have the same habit. I never forward a warning without checking it out first for authenticity. I'd propose this practice as a cardinal rule of responsible internet use. We can't blame the media for spreading misinformation if we're too lazy to check our own sources. I take it a step further and refuse to participate in spreading negative news, gossip, etc. The internet is a creation of our group mind. We are what we think, say and do. Unless we each filter what we spread, we'll only have ourselves to blame for where ever wrong info leads us. The US seems to have gotten into its most recent war because of inaccurate information about weapons of mass destruction. While that might be a worst-case scenario, any contribution to mass fear is not a positive, healing energy for Planet Earth. Let's create the most high-minded mind meld. When you hear the word Internet, remember that a net is also a filter. It can be a positive trigger and reminder that we can each do our part.
Thanks Martin, for a providing a 'critical thinking" approach to how we assess information on the internet! It is indeed refreshing.
Thank goodness this information was false, I love baby carrots. Seeing both sides of the coin...it can hurt a business and cause needless panic, but it can also provide a quick warning if the information is true.
Carrots-Rumours-Lies-Truth-Pharma-Distortion-Deflection
I was heartened by the honest response to the error. It led me to think about how Big Pharma responds to errors. To read my thoughts about this go to http://www.hollywoodsurvivalkit.com
I was pleased to see the honest response to the error made. It prompted me to think about the Big Pharma corporations and their responses to their errors. To read my view go to http://www.hollywoodsurvivalkit.com
carrots-
Thanks for an exellent reminder! I rely on Snopes.com and TruthOrFiction.com to help me along with checking for other verification before using information. :)
Ironically enough, the website that people should be checking is snopes.com NOT snoopes.com as mentioned in your otherwise good article.
Aye, misinformation :)
Post a Comment